Clearview Cancer Center

Quick Links:

Clearview News Wire

Copyright © 2007 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Reuters and the Reuters sphere logo are registered trademarks and trademarks of the Reuters group of companies around the world.



Tanning beds now considered carcinogenic by international cancer group

Last Updated: 2009-07-28 18:30:09 -0400 (Reuters Health)

November 30, 1999

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - In a policy report released Tuesday, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) announced that UV tanning beds have now been placed in the highest risk category -- group 1 -- and is considered "carcinogenic to humans."


Previously, tanning beds had been in group 2A, "probably carcinogenic to humans," according to the report in The Lancet Oncology for August. In addition to tanning beds, UVA, UVB, and UVC radiation were all moved from group 2A to group 1.


"The use of UV-emitting tanning devices is widespread in many developed countries, especially among young women," note Dr. Fatiha El Ghissassi in Lyons and colleagues from the IARC monograph working group.


The current change to the IARC's classification of tanning beds was prompted by a recent meta-analysis indicating that the odds of melanoma is increased by 75% when a person has been exposed to tanning beds before 30 years of age. Another factor in the change was the results of several case-control studies showing a link between tanning devices and ocular melanoma.


In addition to UV radiation, solar and all types of ionizing radiation (alpha- and beta-particle emitters, X-rays and gamma-rays, and neutron radiation) are now classified as group 1.


The report notes that there is "sufficient evidence" of increased melanoma risk in welders, but states that at this point it is unclear if this is due to UV radiation or to exposure to other harmful agents. Thus, a review of the carcinogenic risks of welding is warranted, the authors conclude.


Lancet Oncol 2009;10:751-752.

Other Articles:

February 16, 2010
Occupation a key factor in men's lung cancer risk
February 15, 2010
Pricey scans have no impact in breast cancer: study
February 11, 2010
Researchers find sex-specific lung cancer genes
February 10, 2010
Even third-hand smoke carries carcinogens
February 8, 2010
Men who eat soy may have lower lung cancer risk
February 8, 2010
Well-being similar after total or partial hysterectomy
February 5, 2010
Medicare cuts damage cancer care, group finds
February 5, 2010
Hormone replacement tied to lower colon cancer risk
February 2, 2010
Study weighs benefits of transplants for leukemia
February 1, 2010
Cancer study backs Herceptin with chemo
View All Cancer News