Clearview Cancer Center

Quick Links:

Clearview News Wire

Copyright © 2007 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Reuters and the Reuters sphere logo are registered trademarks and trademarks of the Reuters group of companies around the world.



Tanning beds now considered carcinogenic by international cancer group

Last Updated: 2009-07-28 18:30:09 -0400 (Reuters Health)

July 28, 2009

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - In a policy report released Tuesday, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) announced that UV tanning beds have now been placed in the highest risk category -- group 1 -- and is considered "carcinogenic to humans."


Previously, tanning beds had been in group 2A, "probably carcinogenic to humans," according to the report in The Lancet Oncology for August. In addition to tanning beds, UVA, UVB, and UVC radiation were all moved from group 2A to group 1.


"The use of UV-emitting tanning devices is widespread in many developed countries, especially among young women," note Dr. Fatiha El Ghissassi in Lyons and colleagues from the IARC monograph working group.


The current change to the IARC's classification of tanning beds was prompted by a recent meta-analysis indicating that the odds of melanoma is increased by 75% when a person has been exposed to tanning beds before 30 years of age. Another factor in the change was the results of several case-control studies showing a link between tanning devices and ocular melanoma.


In addition to UV radiation, solar and all types of ionizing radiation (alpha- and beta-particle emitters, X-rays and gamma-rays, and neutron radiation) are now classified as group 1.


The report notes that there is "sufficient evidence" of increased melanoma risk in welders, but states that at this point it is unclear if this is due to UV radiation or to exposure to other harmful agents. Thus, a review of the carcinogenic risks of welding is warranted, the authors conclude.


Lancet Oncol 2009;10:751-752.

Other Articles:

July 27, 2010
Low-risk prostate cancer treated aggressively
July 22, 2010
California city approves marijuana farming
July 22, 2010
No Pap smears for women under 21: guidelines
July 21, 2010
Darker skin doesn't mean melanoma immunity
July 21, 2010
New study backs Avastin in lung cancer
July 19, 2010
Americans turn cold shoulder to sunscreen: poll
July 19, 2010
Lung cancer often recurs more than 5 years after resection
July 16, 2010
U.S. cancer group endorses newer breast cancer drugs
July 15, 2010
Palliative care lacking in much of the world
July 12, 2010
Fish oil might lower breast cancer risk
View All Cancer News