Clearview Cancer Center

Quick Links:

Clearview News Wire

Copyright © 2007 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Reuters and the Reuters sphere logo are registered trademarks and trademarks of the Reuters group of companies around the world.



Red, processed meats linked to prostate cancer

November 9, 2009

Last Updated: 2009-11-05 11:30:25 -0400 (Reuters Health)

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Men who eat a lot of red meat and processed meats may have a higher risk of developing prostate cancer than those who limit such foods, a large study of U.S. men suggests.

Researchers at the National Cancer Institute found that among more than 175,000 men they followed for nine years, those who ate the most red and processed meats had heightened risks of developing any stage of prostate cancer, or advanced cancer in particular.

The findings, reported in the American Journal of Epidemiology, add to a conflicting body of research on meat intake and prostate cancer risk. Because studies over the years have come to different conclusions, experts generally consider the evidence linking red and processed meats to the disease to be limited and inconclusive.

These latest findings do not settle the question. But they do suggest that processed red meats and high-heat cooking methods -- namely, grilling and barbecuing -- may be particularly connected to prostate cancer risk, according to Dr. Rashmi Sinha and her colleagues at the NCI.

For the study, the researchers followed 175,343 U.S. men between the ages of 50 and 71 who were surveyed about their diets -- including how much and what type of meat they typically ate, as well as the cooking methods they used.

The researchers used that information to estimate the levels of certain potentially cancer-promoting chemicals in the men's diets.

Over the next nine years, 10,313 study participants developed prostate cancer and 419 died from the disease.

Overall, the researchers found, the 20 percent of men with the highest intakes of red meat, which in this study included beef and pork, were 12 percent more likely than those who consumed the least to develop prostate cancer. That's after a range of other factors, like smoking, exercise habits and education, were taken into account.

There was a stronger connection to advanced prostate cancer -- with that risk being almost one-third higher among those who ate the most red meat versus those who ate the least.

Similar findings were seen with processed meat. But when the researchers broke the men's diet information down further, they found that red processed meats -- like bacon and red-meat sausage and hot dogs -- were related to higher prostate cancer risk, while white processed meats, like poultry cold cuts, were not.

When it came to cooking methods, the only one that was linked to prostate cancer was grilling/barbecuing, Sinha's team found.

The finding is in line with the theory that meats cooked at high temperatures may be particularly linked to cancer because the cooking process produces certain chemicals -- including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and heterocyclic amines -- that are known to cause cancer in animals.

Giving further support to that idea, the researchers found that higher dietary levels of a PAH called benzo-alpha-pyrene were related to a higher risk of prostate cancer. A similar pattern emerged when the investigators looked at men's intake of nitrites and nitrates -- chemicals used to preserve and flavor processed and cured meats like ham, bacon and sausage.

In the body, nitrites and nitrates can promote the production of potentially cancer-promoting chemicals called nitrosamines.

Taken together, Sinha's team writes, the findings point to potential mechanisms by which certain meats could promote prostate cancer.

They also highlight the importance of studying the relationship between specific types of meat and prostate cancer risk, the researchers say.

Further studies, they conclude, are still needed to establish whether certain meats, and chemicals in those foods, are in fact risk factors for prostate cancer.

SOURCE: American Journal of Epidemiology, November 1, 2009.

Other Articles:

February 16, 2010
Occupation a key factor in men's lung cancer risk
February 15, 2010
Pricey scans have no impact in breast cancer: study
February 11, 2010
Researchers find sex-specific lung cancer genes
February 10, 2010
Even third-hand smoke carries carcinogens
February 8, 2010
Men who eat soy may have lower lung cancer risk
February 8, 2010
Well-being similar after total or partial hysterectomy
February 5, 2010
Medicare cuts damage cancer care, group finds
February 5, 2010
Hormone replacement tied to lower colon cancer risk
February 2, 2010
Study weighs benefits of transplants for leukemia
February 1, 2010
Cancer study backs Herceptin with chemo
January 26, 2010
Alternative prostate cancer vaccine shows promise
January 25, 2010
Project seeks genetic basis of childhood cancer
January 25, 2010
Gene discovery may help guide breast cancer care
January 20, 2010
Deadly brain cancer not a single disease
January 20, 2010
Age important in hereditary pancreatic cancer risk
January 19, 2010
Higher vitamin D levels linked to risk for basal cell carcinoma
January 18, 2010
Mediterranean diet protects against stomach cancer
January 12, 2010
Gene may pinpoint most aggressive prostate cancer
January 12, 2010
Scientists find new leukemia gene risk factors
January 7, 2010
Kidney cancer proves more complicated than thought
January 7, 2010
Low selenium tied to throat, stomach cancers
January 5, 2010
New guidelines back mammograms starting at age 40
January 4, 2010
Proteins show promise for ovarian cancer screening
January 4, 2010
Smoking, drinking up risks of gut, throat cancers
December 23, 2009
Statins lower PSA levels, may impair prostate cancer screening
December 22, 2009
Dietary estrogens have little effect on cancer risk
View All Cancer News