Clearview Cancer Center

Quick Links:

Clearview News Wire

Copyright © 2007 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Reuters and the Reuters sphere logo are registered trademarks and trademarks of the Reuters group of companies around the world.



Red, processed meats linked to prostate cancer

November 9, 2009

Last Updated: 2009-11-05 11:30:25 -0400 (Reuters Health)

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Men who eat a lot of red meat and processed meats may have a higher risk of developing prostate cancer than those who limit such foods, a large study of U.S. men suggests.

Researchers at the National Cancer Institute found that among more than 175,000 men they followed for nine years, those who ate the most red and processed meats had heightened risks of developing any stage of prostate cancer, or advanced cancer in particular.

The findings, reported in the American Journal of Epidemiology, add to a conflicting body of research on meat intake and prostate cancer risk. Because studies over the years have come to different conclusions, experts generally consider the evidence linking red and processed meats to the disease to be limited and inconclusive.

These latest findings do not settle the question. But they do suggest that processed red meats and high-heat cooking methods -- namely, grilling and barbecuing -- may be particularly connected to prostate cancer risk, according to Dr. Rashmi Sinha and her colleagues at the NCI.

For the study, the researchers followed 175,343 U.S. men between the ages of 50 and 71 who were surveyed about their diets -- including how much and what type of meat they typically ate, as well as the cooking methods they used.

The researchers used that information to estimate the levels of certain potentially cancer-promoting chemicals in the men's diets.

Over the next nine years, 10,313 study participants developed prostate cancer and 419 died from the disease.

Overall, the researchers found, the 20 percent of men with the highest intakes of red meat, which in this study included beef and pork, were 12 percent more likely than those who consumed the least to develop prostate cancer. That's after a range of other factors, like smoking, exercise habits and education, were taken into account.

There was a stronger connection to advanced prostate cancer -- with that risk being almost one-third higher among those who ate the most red meat versus those who ate the least.

Similar findings were seen with processed meat. But when the researchers broke the men's diet information down further, they found that red processed meats -- like bacon and red-meat sausage and hot dogs -- were related to higher prostate cancer risk, while white processed meats, like poultry cold cuts, were not.

When it came to cooking methods, the only one that was linked to prostate cancer was grilling/barbecuing, Sinha's team found.

The finding is in line with the theory that meats cooked at high temperatures may be particularly linked to cancer because the cooking process produces certain chemicals -- including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and heterocyclic amines -- that are known to cause cancer in animals.

Giving further support to that idea, the researchers found that higher dietary levels of a PAH called benzo-alpha-pyrene were related to a higher risk of prostate cancer. A similar pattern emerged when the investigators looked at men's intake of nitrites and nitrates -- chemicals used to preserve and flavor processed and cured meats like ham, bacon and sausage.

In the body, nitrites and nitrates can promote the production of potentially cancer-promoting chemicals called nitrosamines.

Taken together, Sinha's team writes, the findings point to potential mechanisms by which certain meats could promote prostate cancer.

They also highlight the importance of studying the relationship between specific types of meat and prostate cancer risk, the researchers say.

Further studies, they conclude, are still needed to establish whether certain meats, and chemicals in those foods, are in fact risk factors for prostate cancer.

SOURCE: American Journal of Epidemiology, November 1, 2009.

Other Articles:

July 27, 2010
Low-risk prostate cancer treated aggressively
July 22, 2010
California city approves marijuana farming
July 22, 2010
No Pap smears for women under 21: guidelines
July 21, 2010
Darker skin doesn't mean melanoma immunity
July 21, 2010
New study backs Avastin in lung cancer
July 19, 2010
Americans turn cold shoulder to sunscreen: poll
July 19, 2010
Lung cancer often recurs more than 5 years after resection
July 16, 2010
U.S. cancer group endorses newer breast cancer drugs
July 15, 2010
Palliative care lacking in much of the world
July 12, 2010
Fish oil might lower breast cancer risk
July 12, 2010
Study finds prostate screening cuts cancer deaths
June 29, 2010
Cancer survivors are often parents of youngsters
June 23, 2010
B vitamins make no difference in heart disease, cancer
June 22, 2010
Top court rejects Pfizer punitive damages appeal
June 21, 2010
Cord blood transplants a viable option in leukemia
June 21, 2010
Untreated prostate cancer no death sentence
June 16, 2010
Sugary foods linked to pancreatic cancer risk
June 15, 2010
Mastectomy rates still declining across US
June 10, 2010
Waiter, there's a potential carcinogen in my soup
June 8, 2010
Breast cancer drug extends lives: study
June 8, 2010
Drug fights tumors in advanced lung cancer
June 5, 2010
Estrogen-like lignan diet, less breast cancer linked
June 4, 2010
New test can predict return of prostate cancer
June 3, 2010
Vaccine against deadly brain cancer shows promise
June 3, 2010
Genes, lifestyle pose separate breast cancer risks
June 2, 2010
Urine test improves prostate diagnosis
View All Cancer News